(PS) Warfield v. United States Air Force

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20202:20-cv-00853California2,922 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK WARFIELD, No. 2:20-cv-00853 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and his initial complaint was found unsuitable for service. ECF No. 3. Now before the court for screening is plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (FAC). I. Screening Standard The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether or not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.