King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ROGER WALKER, Case No. 1:16-cv-01665-AWI-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS

v. DAVIS, NICKS, PERRYMAN, AND POOLE’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

TIM POOLE, et al., GRANTED AND THAT DEFENDANT

SALOUM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUGDMENT BE DENIED 15 (ECF Nos. 111 & 112)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

18 I. INTRODUCTION Roger Walker (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds “against defendants Saloum, Poole, Perryman, Davis, and Nicks on Plaintiff’s claim for failure to protect in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.” (ECF No. 35, p. 2).1 On December 17, 2019, defendants Davis, Nicks, Perryman, and Poole moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 111). On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed his oppositions to the \\\

28 1 …