CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD GOMEZ, No. 2: 17-cv-1247 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 28, 2020, the undersigned directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on or before May 16, 2020. (ECF No. 66.) Plaintiff did not file a pretrial statement. Accordingly, on May 27, 2020, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 68.) In response to the findings and recommendations, on June 12, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 69.) Defendant has not opposed this request. Pursuant to Rule 16(b), a scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “good cause” standard “primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” …