Furia
Furia v. Hirsch
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW FURIA, No. 2:19-cv-942-JAM-KJN (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT
v. (ECF No. 113) SUSANNE MARIE MCGREW, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff and counter-defendant Andrew Furia’s motion for default judgment against defendant PurHydro, LLC. (ECF No. 113.) To date, PurHydro has not opposed Furia’s motion or otherwise made an appearance in this action. The undersigned recommends Furia’s motion for default judgment be GRANTED IN FULL, and that Furia be awarded final judgment against PurHydro in the amount of $100,000 in principal damages plus pre-judgment interest at a rate of 7 percent annum (running from April 26, 2019 through the date of judgment). /// /// /// 27 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(19) for the entry of findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). I. BACKGROUND …