Curry
(PC) Ruiz v. Curry
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 1:17-cv-01407-DAD-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION AND
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
J. CURRY, (Doc. No. 46) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Rogelio May Ruiz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 25, 2019, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 28), dismissing this action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. No. 35.) Judgment was entered on February 25, 2019. Plaintiff appealed the court’s order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Doc. No. 37.) On November 22, 2019, the Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff’s appeal as frivolous. (Doc. Nos. 43, 44.) On June 24, 2020,…