Fatte Alberts v. Pizzaman's Pavilion

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20201:20-cv-00238California2,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FATTE ALBERTS, a California No. 1:20-cv-00238-DAD-SKO partnership, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. JENSEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER PIZZAMAN’S PAVILION and MICHAEL JURISDICTION AND DENYING HIS JENSEN, MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE AS HAVING

BEEN RENDERED MOOT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 9, 12)

18 This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and to change venue filed by pro se defendant Michael Jensen. (Doc. Nos. 9, 12.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 outbreak, the motions were taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 13.) For the reasons set forth below, defendant Jensen’s motion to dismiss this action due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction will be granted and his motion to change venue will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.