Martel

(PC) Bell v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20202:17-cv-00063California3,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL XAVIER BELL, No. 2:17-00063-MCE-CKD (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against defendants Quinto and Brown; an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendants Richardson, Espino-Acevedo, Wagner, Agapay, Gill, Gatchalian, Simon, Go, and Urquidez; and, an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against defendant Spalding. ECF No. 22 at 2 (screening order). Currently pending before the court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to all claims except the excessive force claims against defendants Wagner and Richardson. ECF No.86. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.