Seibel

(PC) Muhammad v. Seibel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20202:18-cv-02831California5,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KWESI MUHAMMAD, No. 2:18-cv-2775 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHERYN KESTERSON, et al., Defendants.

KWESI MUHAMMAD, No. 2:18-cv-2831 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KIMBERLY SEIBEL, et al., Defendants. 22 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the California Training Facility in Soledad. Plaintiff challenges conditions of his prior confinement at Deuel Vocational Institution (DVI). Plaintiff commenced these actions in the San Joaquin County Superior Court. Defendants removed both actions from the Superior Court to this federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 1441(a), paid the filing fees, and filed a related-case notice in each case. The nearly identical First Amended Complaints (FACs) in both cases are before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.