Sullivan

(PC) Snowden v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20201:20-cv-00415California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL L. SNOWDEN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00415-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

W. SULLIVAN, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) DEFENDANTS ) ) [ECF Nos. 11, 12] )

Plaintiff Daniel L. Snowden is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 26, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants Angel Ribera and Jerrick Block. (ECF No. 11.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state a cognizable claim against Defendants Sullivan and Schuyler. (Id.) Therefore, Plaintiff was advised that he could file an amended complaint or a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.