Hohenstein

Hohenstein v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20202:19-cv-01505California2,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY HOHENSTEIN, No. 2:19-cv-01505-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF PLACER and DOES 1–50, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant County of Placer’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff Randy Hohenstein (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 6.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 7.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 10, 2019, Plaintiff alleges he consumed multiple substances in a failed suicide attempt in his vehicle and placed a suicide note on the dashboard. (ECF No. 1 at 3.) Approximately two hours later, Placer County Sheriff’s deputies found him asleep in his vehicle on the side of the road. (Id.) Plaintiff alleges the deputies woke him and asked him to exit the vehicle, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.