Kernan

(PC) Hill v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20202:19-cv-00448California795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH HILL, No. 2:19-cv-00448 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 This case stems from the defendants’ charging of plaintiff with rules violations on two 25 separate occasions, with each charge presented to him through the use of a printout from the 26 Strategic Offender Management System (“SOMS”) instead of through the issuance of a CDCR 27 Form 115 (a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.