Hubbard

(PC) Cramer v. Hubbard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20202:20-cv-00649California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, No. 2: 20-cv-0649 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 5, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and sixty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Sixty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.