Matteson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO E. HERRERA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01150-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

v. ECF No. 15 ROBERT NOUSHMEN,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION

Respondent. TO STAY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 60 DAYS

17 ECF No. 16 18 Petitioner Armando E. Herrera, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition for petitioner’s failure to exhaust all his claims before the state courts. ECF No. 11. Before us now are petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 15, and his motion to stay and hold his petition in abeyance so that he may exhaust his claims, ECF No. 16. For good cause shown, we will grant petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. With respect to petitioner’s motion to stay,…