Petersen
Petersen v. Buyard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:19-cv-00235-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
MEKISHA ROBERSON-BUYARD, (Doc. No. 23) Defendant.
16 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 17, 2019, the court adopted in full the October 4, 2019 findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge. (Doc. Nos. 16, 21.) In the order adopting the findings and recommendations, the court dismissed plaintiff’s action for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 21.) The court also denied plaintiff’s motions for leave to amend because he failed to demonstrate that an amended complaint could remedy the deficiencies identified by the court. (Doc. No. 21; see also…