Kitt

(PC) Jongpil Park v. Kitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20201:19-cv-01551California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONGPIL PARK, Case No. 1:19-cv-01551-AWI-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME

v. ECF Nos. 21, 26 VICTOR V. KITT, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendants. TO APPOINT COUNSEL ECF No. 19 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s unopposed motions for extensions of time to respond to discovery are granted for good cause shown. ECF Nos. 21, 26. Plaintiff shall have an additional sixty days to respond to discovery. The parties are reminded that they must attempt to resolve any discovery disputes among themselves before bringing them to the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1). Plaintiff also moves for the court to appoint counsel. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.