Brito

Brito v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20202:18-cv-00097California5,790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR MANUEL SANCHEZ BRITO, No. 2:18-cv-00097-KJM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR,1 United States Attorney General, 15 Defendant.

17 On July 19, 2017, plaintiff Victor Manuel Sanchez Brito2 filed a petition for review with request for emergency stay of his removal proceedings before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Petition (Brito v. Sessions, 17-72066 (9th Cir. July 19, 2017)), ECF No. 2. On January 17, 2018, the Ninth Circuit transferred the matter to this court for resolution of the factual question of plaintiff’s citizenship under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(B). Transfer Order (Brito v. Sessions, 17-72066 (9th Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)), ECF No. 1. Defendant, United States Attorney

1 Although the Ninth Circuit’s transfer order names Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions III as defendant, current Attorney General William P. Barr is automatically substituted as named defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). 27 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.