(SS) Acton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20202:19-cv-00904California2,862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE ACTON, No. 2:19-cv-00904 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER & ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) finding that his disability ended on July 11, 2016 under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (“Act”). For the reasons discussed below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1988, was found disabled beginning on June 7, 2011. Administrative

1 Disability Insurance Benefits are paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Social Security program, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Supplemental Security Income is paid to disabled 26 persons with low income. 42 U.S.C. § 1382 et seq. Both provisions define disability, in part,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.