Newsom
(PC) Coleman v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey moves to file a previously-submitted exhibit under seal. Because the exhibit contains information identifying class members and is covered by a protective order previously issued in this action (ECF No. 2109), this court finds good cause to grant Lipsey’s motion. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (showing of good cause required to seal exhibits to non-dispositive motion). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Lipsey’s July 9, 2020 motion to seal (ECF No. 6754) is granted. 2. Exhibit L to the declaration of Kate Falkenstien attached to the parties’ Joint Discovery Dispute Statement (ECF No. 6746-13) shall be stricken from the public record. //// //// //// MASE GU UVM OUTING NI VO PO ee OY ove