E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Strategic Materials, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, et al., CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01709-EPG 10 Plaintiffs, O DR END YER IN G GR , A INN PT AIN RG T, , I MN O P TA IR OT N, S A TN OD S EAL v.
STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC.,
13 Defendant.
15 16 17 In connection with their motions for summary judgment, motions to strike, and the various oppositions and replies thereto, Plaintiffs E. & J. Gallo Winery and Gallo Glass Company (“Gallo”) and Defendant Strategic Materials, Inc. (“SMI”) each filed notices to seal their filings. (ECF Nos. 98, 100, 105, 113, 116, 120, 123, 126). At various times, they also filed memoranda in support of the other party’s sealing motions. (ECF Nos. 103, 104, 132, 133). After the Court granted in part and denied in part without prejudice the motions, (ECF No. 135), the parties filed additional briefing concerning their sealing requests, (ECF Nos. 137, 138). Upon review of the materials, and for the reasons below, the Court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, the sealing requests. // 28…