Neuschmid

(HC) Jackson v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20201:20-cv-00198California709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY PECK JACKSON, No. 1:20-cv-00198-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS AS UNTIMELY AND FOR

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM

Respondents. (Doc. No. 12) 16 Petitioner Gregory Peck Jackson, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 22, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed both because it is untimely and because it fails to allege a violation of clearly established federal law. (Doc. No. 12.) The findings and recommendations also recommended that a certificate of appealability not be issued. (Id.) The findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.