Petersen

Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20201:20-cv-00884California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KYLE PETERSEN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION REQUESTING COPY OF COMPLAINT v. (ECF No. 4)

ANTHONY SIMS, JR.,

13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, proceeding pro se in this action, filed a motion requesting that the Court provide him a with a copy of his original Complaint filed June 25, 2020. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff asserts that he requires a copy of the Complaint because he was not permitted by prison staff to make a copy of the Complaint since there was no “immediate deadline that was less than a month away.” (Id. at 1.) According to Plaintiff, he has no other means of obtaining a copy. (Id.) Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk of Court does not ordinarily provide free copies of case documents to parties. The Clerk charges $.50 per page for copies of documents. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Copies of up to twenty pages may be made by the Clerk's Office at this Court upon 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.