CDCR

(HC) Mendoza v. CDCR

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20201:20-cv-00979California1,483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENIO MENDOZA, No. 1:20-cv-00979-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO SUMMARILY DISMISS

CDCR, UNEXHAUSTED PETITION

15 Respondent. [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is in custody at the Kings County Jail pursuant to a 2020 conviction in Kings County Superior Court for making terrorist threats. Petitioner filed the instant petition on July 15, 2020, challenging his current confinement. Because the petition is unexhausted and fails to name a proper respondent, the Court will recommend that it be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION A. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.