Sullivan

(PC) George v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20201:20-cv-00659California1,557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH GEORGE, No. 1:20-cv-00659-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. No. 15) W. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Joseph George is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 3, 2020, the court adopted findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 10), denying plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) and ordering him to pay the filing fee in full within 30 days. (Doc. No. 13.) On July 9, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 15.) Plaintiff argues that (1) the court erroneously found that he accumulated four “strike” dismissals pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.