Modhaddam

(PC) Morris v. Modhaddam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20202:18-cv-02850California852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONDALEE MORRIS, No. 2: 18-cv-2850 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

G. MODHADDAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2020, defendant Tesluk filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 41.) On June 9, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to file an opposition to defendant Tesluk’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 48.) On June 10, 2020, the court advised plaintiff that motions to dismiss shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 49.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Tesluk be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.