Puila
(PS) Mincey v. Puila
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE JAMES MINCEY, JR., LINDA No. 2:20-cv-0571 JAM DB PS
A. MASON-MINCY,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. BETTY M. PUIIA, BETTY M. COMEAU, BETTY M. COMEAU, Trustee of the Betty M. Comeau Trust Dated May 7, 2019, UNITED STATES, et al., 17 Defendants. 19 Plaintiffs Willie James Mincey, Jr., and Linda A. Mason-Mincy, are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs commenced this action of March 16, 2020, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1) On May 20, 2020, plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 11.) That motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on August 28, 2020. (ECF No. 13.) Summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party “shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 …