Lucero

Lucero v. Pennella

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20201:18-cv-01448California3,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, Case No. 1:18-cv-01448-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO

APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION

ANTHONY ROBERT PENNELLA, et al., (ECF Nos. 50, 52, 54) Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Manuel Robert Lucero (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that after transferring from Massachusetts to California to serve his post-conviction supervised release, he was improperly placed on parole rather than probation as ordered by the sentencing judge in Massachusetts, and that special conditions of parole were improperly applied to Plaintiff. Currently before the Court is Defendants’1 motion to compel Plaintiff to participate in a

1 While Defendants’ moving papers only refer to Defendants Hoffman and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.