Lucero
Lucero v. Pennella
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, Case No. 1:18-cv-01448-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO
APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION
ANTHONY ROBERT PENNELLA, et al., (ECF Nos. 50, 52, 54) Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Manuel Robert Lucero (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that after transferring from Massachusetts to California to serve his post-conviction supervised release, he was improperly placed on parole rather than probation as ordered by the sentencing judge in Massachusetts, and that special conditions of parole were improperly applied to Plaintiff. Currently before the Court is Defendants’1 motion to compel Plaintiff to participate in a
1 While Defendants’ moving papers only refer to Defendants Hoffman and…