Puentes

(HC) Clayton v. Puentes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20201:19-cv-00284California879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD CLAYTON, No. 1:19-cv-00284-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

G. PUENTES, (Doc. Nos. 11, 12) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Harold Clayton is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and proceeding on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 23, 2020, respondent moved to dismiss the petition “for lack of Article III standing, ripeness, mootness, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and statutorily for lack of jurisdiction.” (Doc. No. 11 at 1.) Petitioner did not file an opposition to that motion. On May 27, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the court grant respondent’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 12.) The findings and recommendations were served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.