Newsom
(PC) Casto v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERSHEL WAYNE CASTO, II, No. 2:19-cv-2209-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 6, 2020, the court informed plaintiff he could proceed with viable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Smith, Bal, Hernandez, Bentz, Matharu, Rudis, Oania, Jane Does 1-3, Perez, and Clark-Barlow and First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Matharu and Smith, or file an amended complaint. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has elected not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claims identified by the court as viable. ECF No. 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. ///// ///// 28 wOAOe 2 LUV VMELYVYUING VE MVOC tO PIR ee YY eT