Singh

Johnson v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20202:17-cv-00368California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-00368-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. HARJIT SINGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) has filed this civil action seeking relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51 et seq. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 28, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 22.) No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.