(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20201:17-cv-01769California1,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAUDE CARR, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) TO COMPEL

TED PRUITT, ) [ECF No. 63] ) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff Claude Carr is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed on June 16, 2020. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on a claim against Ted Pruitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 14, 15.) More specifically, Plaintiff alleges that on June 21, 2016, while he was performing his job as a waste manager in the Prison Industry Authority food and beverage shop, supervisor Ted Pruitt compelled Plaintiff to manual lift and stack bags of compacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.