Pfeiffer

(PC) Lamon v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20201:20-cv-00896California1,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LOUIS LAMON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00896-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BE

C. PFEIFFER, et.al., ) DENIED ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 3] ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on June 21 29, 2020. 22 I.

LEGAL STANDARDS

24 Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has 25 personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy 26 Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999) (noting that one “becomes a 27 party officially, and is required to take action in that capacity,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.