Pierce

Pierce v. Safe Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20202:20-cv-00985California2,755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ANGELIC PIERCE, individually, No. 2:20-cv-985 WBS DB and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

MOTION TO REMAND

v. SAFE CREDIT UNION, a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Angelic Pierce filed this action against defendant SAFE Credit Union (“SAFE”) and Does 1 through 100, alleging various state law claims arising out of plaintiff’s checking account with SAFE. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Docket No. 10.) I. Factual and Procedural Background Defendant is a credit union and offers its customers checking accounts. (Compl. ¶ 14 (Docket No. 1).) Plaintiff opened a checking account with defendant SAFE. (Compl. ¶ 59.) When opening the account, plaintiff entered into an agreement (“account agreement”) that included “overdraft” and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.