Covello
(HC) Roessler v. Covello
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LEE ROESSLER, No. 2:19-cv-2422-KJM-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has again requested an extension of time to file his opposition to respondent’s March 20, 2020 motion to dismiss and renewed his request for appointment of counsel. As petitioner was previously informed (ECF No. 19), there currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings “if the interests of justice so require.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings. The court will, however, again grant an 26 …