California River Watch v. City of Vacaville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, No. 2:17-cv-00524-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF VACAVILLE, Defendant. 16 In this case in which plaintiff California River Watch (“plaintiff” or “River Watch”) alleges toxic contamination under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B), each party moves for summary judgment on the sole remaining claim related to the presence of hexavalent chromium in the public water supply as endangering human health. Plaintiff also moves to exclude portions of the expert witness report offered by defendant City of Vacaville (“defendant” or “Vacaville”) and also moves to strike the declaration of Adam Love in support of Vacaville’s summary judgment motion. Vacaville 24 1 The complaint originally set forth a single claim under the RCRA with two component parts: one for endangerment to human health and one for endangerment to the environment. See 26 Compl. ¶¶ 27–32, ECF…