(SS) Puckett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20202:19-cv-01226California5,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NANETTE MARGUREITE PUCKETT, No. 2:19-cv-01226-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), partially denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401-34, and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381-1383f.1 For the reasons that follow, the court will GRANT plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, DENY the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this order. 24 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470 (1986). SSI is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.