(PC) Beaton v. State of California, CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 1:19-cv-01072-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR et al., ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 11) 16 Plaintiff Paul Nivard Beaton is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 29, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s lack of standing and failure to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. No. 11.) In particular, the magistrate judge found that, despite the ample guidance provided in the court’s screening order of plaintiff’s original complaint, plaintiff again failed in his FAC to…