(PC) Mariscal v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20201:20-cv-00089California2,271 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OMAR MARISCAL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00089-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., (ECF NO. 13)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE Omar Mariscal (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on January 17, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that it failed to state a claim because it failed to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20. (ECF No. 3). The Court allowed Plaintiff to choose between filing an amended complaint or notifying the Court that he wants to stand on his complaint. Plaintiff filed his first Amended…