(PC) Mariscal v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20201:20-cv-00089California2,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR MARISCAL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00089-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., (ECF NO. 13)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Omar Mariscal (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on January 17, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that it failed to state a claim because it failed to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20. (ECF No. 3). The Court allowed Plaintiff to choose between filing an amended complaint or notifying the Court that he wants to stand on his complaint. Plaintiff filed his first Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.