Kelso

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20201:12-cv-00983California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

STRONACH, et al., ) BE DENIED ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 241] ) )

Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on July 20, 2020. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants Stronach, Gonzales, LeMay, Beltran, Fisher, Snell and Tann for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On April 25, 2019, the Court issued an amended scheduling order, and the deadline for completion of all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.