Beam

(PC) Baker v. Beam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20201:16-cv-01737California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE BAKER, Case No. 1:16-cv-01737-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND

v. DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES

BEAM, et al., (ECF No. 65) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mike Baker (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Vogel, Caldwell, and Cervantes for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendants Vasquez, Vogel, Beam, Cuevas, Caldwell, Cervantes, Huerta, Benevidas, Goree, Cribbs, Diaz, Jarvis, and Pacillas for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; (3) Defendants Vasquez, Vogel, Beam, Cuevas, Caldwell, Cervantes, Huerta, and Benevidas for conspiracy; (4) Defendants Vogel, Beam, Cuevas, Caldwell, Cervantes, Huerta, and Benevidas for denial of access to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.