Sherman
(PC) Pena v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALFREDO RUDY PENA, 1:18-cv-01527-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS; DISMISSING THIS CASE
v. WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE
CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE
STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants.
17 Alfredo Rudy Pena (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges as follows. In 2015, while incarcerated at Solano State Prison, plaintiff was diagnosed with the eye condition uveitis and received treatment. (Doc. No. 11 at 6.) During 2016, plaintiff’s uveitis symptoms returned while he was incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility and State Prison (SATF) in Corcoran, California. …