Sherman

(PC) Pena v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20201:18-cv-01527California1,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDO RUDY PENA, 1:18-cv-01527-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; DISMISSING THIS CASE

v. WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE

CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE

STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants.

17 Alfredo Rudy Pena (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges as follows. In 2015, while incarcerated at Solano State Prison, plaintiff was diagnosed with the eye condition uveitis and received treatment. (Doc. No. 11 at 6.) During 2016, plaintiff’s uveitis symptoms returned while he was incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility and State Prison (SATF) in Corcoran, California. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.