(PS) Cleveland v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DOMINGO L. CLEVELAND, SR, No. 2:16-cv-02308-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, Defendant. 15 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing this case. ECF No. 121. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and accordingly this motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The court construes plaintiff’s request as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s request should be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed his complaint on September 27, 2016, along with an application to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 1. The case was litigated through defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the merits, which the undersigned recommended be granted. ECF No. 111. Plaintiff filed objections to…