Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20202:18-cv-01692California5,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC et al., 12 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC.,

et al., Defendants. 17 By way of this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries sustained as a result of a fatal altercation between Tyler S. Rushing (“Decedent”)1 and the following groups of Defendants: (1) AG Security Protection, Inc. (“AG”), and AG security guard and supervisor Edgar Sanchez (“Sanchez”) (collectively the “Security Defendants”); (2) the City of Chico (the “City”), the Chico Police Department (“Chico PD”), Chico PD Sergeant Scott Ruppel, and Officers Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin (collectively the “City Defendants”); and (3) the County of Butte (the “County”), the Butte County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”), and Deputy Sheriff Ian Dickerson (collectively the “County Defendants”). Presently before the Court are three separate Motions for ///

1 Plaintiffs are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.