McFadden-Jensen

(PC) Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20202:18-cv-00613California286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMBERT G. CHAMBERS, No. 2:18-cv-0613-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. MCFADDEN-JENSEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lambert G. Chambers (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 4, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.