Wise

(PC) Witkin v. Wise

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20202:19-cv-00974California2,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WITKIN, No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. WISE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ June 3, 2020 motion to modify the scheduling order and limit discovery. (ECF No. 33.) Also pending is plaintiff’s June 10, 2020 motion to modify the scheduling order and June 15, 2020 motion to amend. (ECF Nos. 35, 37.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants opposed plaintiff’s motion to amend. (ECF No. 42.) Defendants did not file an opposition to plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order. Background This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint filed August 12, 2019 (ECF No. 12), as to the following claims: 1) defendants Wise and Matteson allegedly violated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.