Furia

Furia v. Hirsch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20202:19-cv-00942California3,472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW FURIA, No. 2:19-cv-00942-JAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING THE BANK OF

AMERICA AND WELLS FARGO BANK’S

SUSANNE MARIE MCGREW, an MOTIONS TO DISMISS individual; LAURIE HIRSCH, an individual; PURHYDRO, LLC, a Nevada corporation; WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION; BANK OF AMERICA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, National ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 And Related Actions. 21 On November 26, 2019, the Court granted Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America” or “BofA”) and Wells Fargo Bank’s, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) (collectively “the Banks”) joint motion to intervene, as they possessed the disputed funds at the heart of this litigation. See Order Granting Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 36. The Banks have since deposited the disputed funds with the Court. They now move to be discharged from the suit and to be reimbursed for the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.