Halliday

Halliday v. Spjute

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20201:07-cv-00620California2,768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELLY J. IOANE, et al., Case No. 1:07-cv-00620-AWI-EPG

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. (ECF Nos. 534, 544)

JEAN NOLL, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Before the Court is the motion for protective order filed by defendant Jean Noll (“Defendant”) filed June 9, 2020. (ECF No. 534.) The parties subsequently filed a joint statement of discovery disagreement. (ECF No. 544.) The Court deemed the motion for protective order suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 548.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the motion. BACKGROUND Shelly Ioane (“Plaintiff”)1 filed this Bivens suit against Defendant Jean Noll, an Internal Revenue Service Agent, alleging that Defendant violated Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right to bodily privacy when, during a June 2006 lawful execution of a search warrant, Defendant escorted Plaintiff to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.