Shnider
(HC) Kibunguchy v. Shnider
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS WAMALWA KIBUNGUCHY, No. 2:20-cv-0495-TLN-DB Petitioner, v. ORDER SMY SHNIDER, et al. Respondents. 16 Petitioner Chris Wamalwa Kibunguchy (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 7, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 13.) Petitioner has not filed any objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…