Hearn

(PC) Thorpe v. Hearn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20202:19-cv-01974California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RENELL THORPE, No. 2: 19-cv-1974 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. HEARN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. On March 10, 2020, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff failed to file an opposition. Accordingly, on April 13, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff sixty days to file an opposition. (ECF No. 34.) The undersigned advised plaintiff that failure to file an opposition would be deemed as consent to having the motion for partial summary judgment granted. (Id.) Sixty days passed and plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment. On June 25, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.