Juarez

(PC) Stuckey v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20201:18-cv-01557California3,515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY, 1:18-cv-01557-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND DENYING MOTION FOR STAY AS

J. JUAREZ, et al., MOOT Defendants. (ECF Nos. 46, 48) 14 Plaintiff Andrew Kenneth Stuckey is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 37.) Currently before the Court is Defendants’ exhaustion-related motion for summary judgment, filed on June 5, 2020. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action shall proceed on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed June 7, 2019, (ECF No. 15), against Defendants Chanelo and Peacock for violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On December 5, 2019, Defendants filed an answer to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.