Najera

(PC) Miller v. Najera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20201:20-cv-00234California625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN R. MILLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00234-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AN INDEFINITE EXTENSION

v. ECF No. 12 ALBERT NAJERA, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED AS

DUPLICATIVE OF CASE NUMBER 1:19-

CV-01077-AWI-BAM

OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Steven R. Miller is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On April 13, 2020, the court ordered that plaintiff show cause why this case should not be dismissed as duplicative of case number 1:19-CV-01077-AWI-BAM. ECF No. 7. On May 18, 2020, plaintiff asked for an indefinite extension of time to respond, citing lockdowns resulting from COVID-19. ECF No. 8. The court granted plaintiff an additional 60 days. ECF No. 11. On July 17, 2020, plaintiff again moved for an indefinite extension of 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.